Product Code Database
Example Keywords: ocarina of -sweatshirt $30-192
barcode-scavenger
   » » Wiki: Cleveland Shale
Tag Wiki 'Cleveland Shale'.
Tag

The Cleveland Shale, also referred to as the Cleveland Member of the , is a () geologic member in the eastern United States.


Identification and name
The Cleveland Shale was identified in 1870 and named for the city of , . John Strong Newberry, director of the Ohio State Geological Survey, first identified the member in 1870. He called it the "Cleveland Shale" and designated its type locality at near Cleveland. Details of the type locality and of stratigraphic nomenclature for this unit as used by the U.S. Geological Survey are available on-line at the National Geologic Map Database.


Description
The primary minerals in the Cleveland Shale are , , , and . Underground, the Cleveland Shale is black, dull grayish-black, bluish-black, or brownish-black in color. In exposed outcrops, it weathers to red, reddish-brown, or medium brown. Highly weathered rock turns gray. It is fairly fissile, breaking into thin, irregularly shaped sheets or flakes that occasionally display crystals of . Relieved of stress once exposed, the Cleveland Shale is nonplastic and can appear as if fragmented into blocks due to jointing.


Pyrite basal boundary
There is a sharp and clear distinction between the Cleveland Shale and underlying . At the very bottom of the Cleveland Shale there is a thin, discontinuous layer of . This pyrite layer is discontinuous because after this rock was laid down, it was eroded. The erosion increases as one moves south along the valley of the and east to the Grand River. Portions of the pyrite layer, known as Skinner's Run Bed, contain fragments of and fossilized fish bones worn smooth by the action of water. Above the pyrite layer, a layer is found in west-central (but not eastern) Ohio.

The remainder of the Cleveland Shale generally consists of a relatively hard, organic rich . It has both an upper and lower part.


Lower part
A clay shale, described as bluish or bluish-gray and as olive-black to brownish-black, forms the lower part. The lower part can be anywhere from a few inches to several feet in thickness. This layer is sometimes referred to as the Olmstead shale. This layer has been dated to between 362.6 and 361.0 million years old based on conodont biozones ( Bispathodus aculeatus aculeatus to Bispathodus ultimus ultimus zones). Thin beds of gray or brown , lumps of pyrite, and layers of -heavy limestone with cone-in-cone structures are found in the lower part. In eastern Ohio, thin gray veins ("stringers") of siltstone appear. In western Ohio, the Cleveland Shale appears to interbed with the Chagrin Shale below it, erasing the clear boundary between the two rock units.


Upper part
The upper part of the Cleveland Shale is a black to brownish black silty shale with occasional thin beds of gray shale and siltstone. The upper part is much richer in petroleum and . When broken open, fresh samples smell like crude oil. Where the upper part is thick, and particularly in northeast Ohio, the shale has a distinctive "rippled" appearance. The upper of the Cleveland Shale contains abundant nodules of , nodules and bands (extremely thin beds) of pyrite, bands of , and lamination. Almost no are found in the upper part.


Geographic extent
The Cleveland Shale is a geologic member in in the United States. The Cleveland Shale underlies much of northeast Ohio in beds of varying thickness.

In northeast Ohio, the member does not appear east of the Grand River. Measurements taken in northeast Ohio show the Cleveland Shale to be to thick. It is thickest around the Rocky River north of Berea, Ohio, and thins to the east, west, and south.

The Cleveland Shale is found in east-central . In east-central Kentucky, the Cleveland Shale is more uniform in thickness, ranging from , and increases in thickness toward the east.

The unit is also present in West VirginiaRyder, R.T., Swezey, C.S., Crangle, R.D., Jr., and Trippi, M.T., 2008, Geologic cross section E-E' Https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sim2985< /ref> and in southwest Virginia,Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., and Swezey, C.S., 2015, Geologic cross section I-I' Https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/sim3343< /ref> where it is mapped as the Cleveland Member of the Ohio Shale.


Stratigraphic setting
The Cleveland Shale (or Cleveland Member) is a sub-unit of the Formation. The underlies the Cleveland Shale. The generally overlies the Cleveland Shale, with a sharp distinction between the two. In west-central Ohio, more than of Bedford Shale may lie above the Cleveland Shale. In places, red and grey shale may intertongue (interlock) with the Cleveland Shale extensively. In far eastern Ohio, the Bedford Shale thins by more than . Where the is also present, the Bedford Shale is usually less than and may be locally absent. In some areas, the Cleveland Shale is described as or overlaid gradationally by and sharply by .

It is the regional equivalent of the Hangenberg Black Shale and the .


Paleobiota
Exceptional marine animal are found in the member. The Cleveland Shale is generally considered to be fossil-poor, but there are exceptions. The basal pyrite layer contains petrified wood and fossilized fish bones. The lower part is famous for its extensive and well-preserved fossil (including ), , , and palaeoniscinoids ray-finned fishes. The giant predatory placoderms , , , , and five species (including the type specimen) of were all discovered in the Cleveland Shale. The Cleveland Shale is classified as a konservatte-lagerstatten, which means it often preserves complete body fossils. Typical early shark preservation includes soft tissue outlines and impressions, fin rays, gill musculature, cartilage, and stomach contents. Placoderms in the Cleveland Shale typically do not show any good soft-tissue preservation.

Faunal list follows Carr and Jackson (2008) and Carr (2018).


Placodermi
All placoderms in the Cleveland Shale are .
B. perissusA medium-sized with a relatively low and narrow skull and a presumably diet.
C. regularisA rare possible based on small jaw plates.
"""C." cuyahogaeA rare of uncertain affinities, based on a single jaw plate. Not necessarily a close relative of more complete and better-described species of Coccosteus.
D. mirabilisA somewhat large with narrow serrated jaws.
D. terrelliA very large with a massive bite force and an niche. The most famous placoderm in general, as well as one of the largest and most common fish in the Cleveland Shale. Previously considered a species of .
G. verrucosa

A rare arthrodire of uncertain affinities, known from a few roughly-textured belly plates.
G. clarkiA very large aspinothoracid, similar in size and ecology to Dunkleosteus. Previously considered a species of Dinichthys.
G. hydeiA selenosteid with a low, broad skull and small tooth-like denticles along the jaw.
H. gouldiiAn aspinothoracid with a boxy skull. Previously considered a species of Dinichthys.
H. jacksoniAn aspinothoracid.
H. holdeniAn aspinothoracid similar to Heintzichthys, though with a deeper jaw.
H. minorA small dunkleosteid with a very short, deep jaw.
M. eurhinusA mylostomatid with a very broad skull.
M. newberryi
M. variabile
P. arcualisA small selenosteid with a narrow skull.
S. brevisA small selenosteid with a broad skull.
S. angustopectusA small selenosteid similar to Selenosteus, with a broad skull.
S. glaber
T. agassiziA very large mylostomatid based on multiple species, some of which may be synonyms. The second most common placoderm in the Cleveland Shale after Dunkleosteus terrelli. Titanichthys hussakofi was formerly known as Brontichthys clarki.
T. attenuatus
T. clarkii
T. hussakofi
T. rectus
T. clarkiA rare possible selenosteid known from a few armor fragments.


Chondrichthyes
Other undescribed (cartilaginous fish) from the Cleveland Shale include a cladoselachian, a cochliodont, a , a , (including a new species of Stethacanthus), , and several additional forms represented by unique head and fin spines. A conference abstract by Hlavin (1972) briefly mentioned associated assemblages of teeth ( Orodus sp.) and fin spines ( Ctenacanthus vetustus); Zangerl (1981) suggested that each assemblage represented an early hybodont with Orodus-like teeth and ctenacanth-like spines.
C. acanthopterygiusA common shark-like predator with large eyes, teeth, a broad mouth at the front of the head, a robust spine, a streamlined body, and a tall with wide keels on the tail stalk. Ecologically similar to , though not closely related to any modern shark. Potentially a (close to Stethacanthus) and/or an early (distantly related to modern ). Many Cladoselache species have been named based primarily on subtle variation in fin structure, though some will likely turn out to be invalid or synonymous upon reinvestigation. The two most frequently mentioned species are C. fyleri (the , which is rather small) and C. kepleri (a larger species).
C. brachypterygius
C. clarki
C. desmopterygius
C. eastmani
C. fyleri
C. kepleri
C. magnificus
C. newberryi
C. pachypterygius
C. concinnusA ctenacanthiform shark with many named species, some of which appear to be synonymous with others. Some ctenacanth species named from the Cleveland Shale are based on fin spines ( C. compressus, C. clarki, C. vetustus), while others ( C. concinnus, C. terrelli, C. tumidus) are based on cladodont teeth. Specimens preserving both teeth and fin spines demonstrate that C. concinnus, C. compressus, and C. clarki are probably all the same species, with C. concinnus taking priority. As a result, C. concinnus is regarded as the Cleveland Shale ctenacanth with the best-preserved specimens (formerly referred to the spine-based species). C. tumidus may be the largest shark in the member based on the size of its teeth.
C. terrelli
C. tumidus
C. vetustus?
D. hydeiA possible with a distinct rostrum, small fins, and minute many-cusped teeth.
M. clarkiA very similar to Cladoselache. Primarily distinguished by some of its cladodont teeth being single-cusped, though multi-cusped teeth are also present in the jaw. There is disagreement over whether it should be treated as a valid distinct genus or not.
O. spp. (x3)At least three undescribed species of known from broad crushing teeth. Complete Orodus specimens from Late Carboniferous Indiana have a long body and small fins.
P. politusA phoebodontid known from small teeth with three main cusps. Complete Phoebodus specimens from Late Devonian are similar in proportion to modern .
S. altonensisA symmoriiform with cladodont teeth, extensive denticles on the head and an unusual "spine-brush complex".
S. carinatus
T. vetustusA ctenacanthiform shark preserving both skull cartilage and cladodont teeth.


Osteichthyes
Other undescribed (bony fish) from the Cleveland Shale include a new species of Kentuckia and an unnamed -like .
K. hlaviniA palaeonisciform (ray-finned fish).
P. wagneriA . The only (lobe-finned fish) currently recorded from the Cleveland Member.
T. clarkiA palaeonisciform actinopterygian.


Age
The Cleveland Shale is approximately 362.6 to 360.1 million years old, daing to the very latest part of the period, the ,
(2026). 9780128243602
based on biostratigraphy from conodonts and plant spores. The Cleveland Shale extends all the way to the that ended the Devonian but does not reach the very end of the Devonian period. Unlike the Permian-Triassic extinction and Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction the Devonian-Carboniferous boundary does not correlate with the mass extinction event at the end of this period. The and represent Devonian layers that post-date the Devonian-Carboniferous extinction but were deposited on top of the Cleveland Shale, and encompass some of the recovery fauna otherwise typical of the Carboniferous in the aftermath of the .

The upper 2.5 m of the Cleveland Shale has been chemostratigraphically correlated with the and the type stratigraphy in Germany, suggesting that the Cleveland Shale preserves the second of the two mass extinction events that together comprise the late Devonian extinction


Interpretation of depositional environments
The Cleveland Shale is likely the regional expression of the , a major extinction event that occurred near the end of the period. The Cleveland Shale is interpreted as having accumulated in an anaerobic environment. Evidence exists to suggest that the Cleveland Shale was laid down during the Dasberg event, an Upper Famennian extinction event that devastated land-based flora and marine-based fauna. This led to a significant drop in marine oxygen (an ) and atmospheric carbon dioxide, and then a brief . The global environment recovered, only to suffer another extinction, the , close to the Devonian- boundary. While the Cleveland Shale was being deposited, extensive organic matter from the land was swept into the sea then lying over Ohio. Although there is dispute over how deep this sea was, the Dasberg event meant that oceans could support few to no bottom-dwelling animals. This explains why the Cleveland Shale largely lacks fossils of benthic organisms and has a high carbon content that colors the shale very dark gray to black.

The contact between the Chagrin Shale and Cleveland Shale has been described as . This feature is interpreted as having been caused when two different depositional environments (in this case, the oxygenated sea which laid down the Chagrin Shale and the anaerobic sea rich in organic matter which laid down the Cleveland Shale) moved repeatedly back and forth over the same area. Geologist Horace R. Collins called the boundary area intercalated, but it is unclear what meaning he intended.

Different hypotheses have been suggested as the cause of the regional, irregular contact between the Cleveland Shale and Bedford Formation. Charles E.B. Conybeare has noted that the Cleveland Shale is siltier in the east and more in the west. He hypothesized that this indicates that silt flowed into the sea from east to west. Current eroded the Cleveland Shale and then laid down new sediment in the gullies which became the Bedford Formation. Jack C. Pashin and Frank R. Ettensohn proposed a variation on this hypothesis. They note that the region containing the Cleveland Shale was undergoing uplift when the Bedford Formation was being deposited. This likely led to exposure and erosion of the Cleveland Shale, with sediment which became the Bedford Formation filling in these . They also observe that there is evidence of (the intrusion of deformable Cleveland Shale upward into the more brittle Bedford Formation), as well as intertonguing. Baird et al. note that the Cleveland Shale also tilts downward to the south. They suggest that this caused overstepping, rather than intertonguing.


Economic geology
The high organic content of the Cleveland Shale makes it eminently suitable for the formation of fossil fuels. One 1981 study found that the Cleveland Shale can yield an average of of per of rock. The Cleveland Shale also contains and "true" , although neither in great quantity.


See also
  • List of fossiliferous stratigraphic units in Ohio
  • Marcellus Formation
  • Escuminac Formation
  • Floresta Formation
  • Hunsrück Slate
  • Late Devonian extinction event

Notes

Citations


Bibliography

Page 1 of 1
1
Page 1 of 1
1

Account

Social:
Pages:  ..   .. 
Items:  .. 

Navigation

General: Atom Feed Atom Feed  .. 
Help:  ..   .. 
Category:  ..   .. 
Media:  ..   .. 
Posts:  ..   ..   .. 

Statistics

Page:  .. 
Summary:  .. 
1 Tags
10/10 Page Rank
5 Page Refs
2s Time